Octet

What are the symptoms of a duplex mismatch, and why do they look that way?

Show the answer

Say this first

The link is up and ping works, but anything heavy crawls. The half-duplex side counts late collisions, because it treats the other side's traffic as collisions and aborts its own frames well past the first 64 bytes. The full-duplex side counts CRC errors and runts, because it receives those cut-off frames. Throughput collapses under load since TCP sees loss. Cisco CDP logs a %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH message.

Go deeper

Mechanism

  • The full-duplex side transmits whenever it has data. It never listens for collisions.
  • The half-duplex side runs CSMA/CD. If it is sending and a frame arrives, it calls that a collision, sends a jam signal and stops. If that happens after the first 512 bits (64 bytes), it is a late collision, and the MAC does not retry the frame. Loss is left to TCP.
  • The full-duplex side receives the truncated frame plus jam, which fails the FCS: CRC errors and runts.

On the counters

Full-duplex side:

Output
SW1# show interfaces GigabitEthernet1/0/2 | include CRC|runts
     112 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     845 input errors, 733 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored

Half-duplex side:

Output
SW2# show interfaces FastEthernet0/1 | include collision
     0 output errors, 2290 collisions, 3 interface resets
     0 babbles, 418 late collision, 1022 deferred

And the CDP hint on SW1:

Output
%CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/0/2 (not half duplex), with SW2 FastEthernet0/1 (half duplex).

Why ping hides it

Small, occasional packets rarely overlap with traffic in the other direction. A file copy keeps both directions busy (data one way, ACKs the other), so collisions explode.

Fix

Make both sides the same: both auto (preferred) or both hard-coded to the same speed and duplex. Then clear counters and confirm CRC and late collisions stop increasing.

Traps

  • Putting late collisions on the full-duplex side. Full duplex never counts collisions.
  • Concluding the link is fine because ping works.
How did you do?Book 2.6 Multi-Access Networks